Denmark country photograph
Denmark flag
AML & CTF regulatory handbook

Denmark

Retail banking / Individual customer / Onboarding

Selected requirements
24
Source records
49
As-of date
2026-10-12

Reader context

Country and scenario

More views
ToolsEvidence coverageSourcesRecent changesFull documents & provisionsSearchQuestions
Scenario overview

In summary

Use the consumer's recorded consent to coordinate the sending and receiving providers, preserve payment continuity and apply the statutory working-day deadlines.

Supporting requirements
Read more scenario context

Check the deposit limit, restricted payment services and nationality/residence exceptions independently; a deposit exception is not sanctions clearance.

Supporting requirements

Establishing a covered business relationship requires CDD without a minimum transaction amount. Repeat CDD on relevant changes, appropriate occasions, suspicion or identity doubts.

Supporting requirements
Start with a task

What do you need to do?

View all requirements
Source traceability

Legislation and requirement mapping

See how each requirement links to its authority, source type and exact supporting provision.

Open full mapping
Preview of legislation and requirement mapping for Denmark
RequirementSource typeAuthoritySupporting provision
Applicability review needed

From 15 September 2026, retain the AML framework and add the enacted proliferation-risk assessment, financial-sanctions controls and applicable independent-testing branch.

legislationRetsinformation / Finanstilsynet, Retsinformation / Skatte- og VaekstministerietLBK 433/2026 sections 7(1)-(2), 8(1)-(2), 8(4), 8(6), pp. 4-5; Act 764/2026 section 1 nos. 1-4 (new section 4a and amended sections 7/8), p. 1, section 20(1)-(2) and section 21, p. 8
Applicability review needed

Establishing a covered business relationship requires CDD without a minimum transaction amount. Repeat CDD on relevant changes, appropriate occasions, suspicion or identity doubts.

legislationRetsinformation / FinanstilsynetLBK 433/2026 section 10 nos. 1, 2(a)-(d), 4-5, p. 5
Review pending

Obtain name and CPR number or equivalent; if neither exists obtain date of birth. Verify identity using a reliable, independent source.

legislationRetsinformation / Finanstilsynet, FinanstilsynetLBK 433/2026 section 11(1) nos. 1(a), 2, pp. 5-6; VEJ 9864/2020 section 9.3, printed pp. 59-60 (PDF pp. 60-61)
Applicability review needed

Check who is acting for the customer, independently verify that person's identity and establish authority; identify and reasonably verify relevant beneficial owners.

legislationRetsinformation / FinanstilsynetLBK 433/2026 section 11(1) no. 3 and section 11(2), p. 6
Applicability review needed

Assess the relationship's purpose and intended nature and calibrate CDD to its purpose, scale, regularity and duration. Simplified CDD needs an established low-risk basis.

legislationRetsinformation / FinanstilsynetLBK 433/2026 section 11(1) no. 4, section 11(3)-(4), p. 6; section 21(1), p. 8; Annexes 2-3, pp. 34-35
Previous checked narrative

Baseline reading under review

For an individual, start with name and CPR number or equivalent, using date of birth where neither identifier exists. Verify those details against reliable independent evidence. The Danish guidance does not make photo identification universally mandatory, so assess credible alternatives when standard documents are unavailable. Normally complete verification before establishing the relationship or executing a transaction. Deferral depends on the statutory business-continuity and limited-risk conditions; preliminary account creation does not create a general permission to transact before verification. Supporting requirements

A successful MitID check answers an identity question, not the whole onboarding decision. Guidance allows substantial-assurance MitID to stand alone in suitable low- or medium-risk cases, but customer-specific concerns can call for additional sources and it is not the sole route for enhanced-diligence cases. Separately assess the relationship's purpose, intended use, scale and regularity. Those facts determine whether the knowledge obtained is sufficient and whether simplified measures are justified, rather than treating electronic verification as a customer-risk classification. Supporting requirements

Evidence details