Nieuw boetebeleid voor niet-gemelde tekortkomingen in transactierapportages
RegCanary analysis of a AFM publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
This policy clarifies the regulator's expectations and the consequences for firms that identify reporting shortcomings but do not notify the AFM. For compliance teams, the key message is that detection alone is not enough—firms must have robust processes to identify, assess, and report transaction reporting errors to the regulator. The AFM's move signals a tougher stance on reporting failures and a focus on proactive disclosure.
Firms should review their transaction reporting frameworks, including data quality controls, exception monitoring, and escalation procedures. Where deficiencies are found, they should be documented and reported promptly to the AFM. The policy also increases the risk of fines for non-disclosure, making it essential for senior management and compliance functions to understand their obligations.
Opportunities exist for firms that invest in reporting technology and controls: they can reduce regulatory risk, improve data integrity, and demonstrate good governance. RegTech providers may see demand for solutions that automate detection and reporting of transaction reporting errors. Overall, this is a significant compliance development for investment firms and those with MiFIR reporting obligations.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
AFM
Original publication, 14 October 2026
Read the original publication afm.nlThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the AFM's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.