FINMA publishes partially revised FINMA Anti-Money Laundering Ordinance
RegCanary analysis of a FINMA publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For compliance teams, the practical effect is less about wholesale redesign and more about evidence: firms should test whether current onboarding, ongoing monitoring, beneficial-ownership and PEP controls align with the updated minimum standards and the newly issued guidance on Circular 2011/1. Financial intermediaries should also revisit whether their activities fall within the regulated perimeter, particularly where advisory, distribution or intermediary models have changed. Action items: map the revisions against existing AML policies and SRO obligations; update risk assessments and due-diligence checklists; refresh training and file documentation; confirm governance sign-off and audit trails.
Institutions with cross-border or intermediary-heavy models should prioritise legal-entity and licensing reviews. The revision reinforces supervisory expectations rather than creating an entirely new regime, so early gap analysis can reduce remediation risk and demonstrate proactive conduct. FINMA has not, in this announcement, set out detailed transition dates, so compliance leaders should track the ordinance’s effective date and any SRO implementation guidance before finalising changes.
Overall: moderate-to-significant operational impact for Swiss-regulated banks and wealth/advisory firms; limited direct impact for firms outside the Swiss perimeter.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- Financial Crime
Source
FINMA
Original publication, 10 November 2026
Read the original publication finma.chThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the FINMA's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.