ASIC News 1 min read

26-273MR ASIC finds private credit practices continue to leave investors in the dark

RegCanary analysis of a ASIC publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

The regulator highlights complex structures and opacity as persistent issues. For compliance teams, this signals heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential enforcement risks. Firms involved in private credit—including issuers, distributors, and advisers—should review their disclosure frameworks to ensure transparency and clarity.

Key actions include: conducting gap assessments against ASIC's expectations, enhancing disclosure of fees and conflicts, simplifying complex structures where possible, and strengthening investor communication. Proactive remediation can mitigate regulatory action and reputational damage. Given ASIC's focus, firms should anticipate further surveillance and possible regulatory changes.

This also presents an opportunity to differentiate through best-in-class transparency, building investor trust and competitive advantage. Compliance leaders should prioritize this area and consider engaging with industry bodies to shape best practices.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

ASIC

Original publication, 10 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) asic.gov.au

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the ASIC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo