Ekaterine Galdava Discusses the Development of Cross-Border Payments, Interoperability of Payment Systems, and Strengthening of Regional Cooperation at the Tbilisi Finance Summit
RegCanary analysis of a NBG publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For compliance and payments executives, the emphasis on stablecoin-enabled international payments alongside traditional rails is the key signal: expect supervisory attention on how firms govern novel settlement assets, manage counterparty and liquidity risk, and evidence AML/CFT controls across corridors. Firms with Caucasus, Black Sea or Central Asian exposure should treat this as an early directional indicator rather than a rule change — no binding requirements were announced — but it is a timely prompt to review cross-border payment governance, correspondent relationships and digital asset risk appetites. Practical actions: map your payment corridors against emerging interoperability initiatives; confirm your stablecoin exposure and related controls are captured in risk frameworks; track NBG publications and any follow-on consultation or sandbox activity; and ensure regional regulatory engagement and information-sharing arrangements are documented.
Institutions positioning early on standards alignment and regulator dialogue may gain speed-to-market and licensing advantages as regional connectivity deepens. Priority: monitor and prepare, not remediate.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
NBG
Original publication, 29 October 2026
Read the original publication nbg.gov.geThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the NBG's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.