Piero Cipollone: Next-day securities settlement, tokenisation and the transformation of Europe’s financial infrastructure
RegCanary analysis of a ECB publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
Although the remarks are not binding, they matter for firms planning settlement-cycle changes, digital asset strategies and cross-border operating models. Compliance teams should treat this as an early signal: map exposure to a potential EU/EEA T+1 migration, review settlement risk controls, client disclosure, reconciliation, FX funding and collateral processes, and assess how tokenised securities or DLT-based settlement could affect custody, legal certainty and operational resilience. Actionable next steps include a gap assessment against T+1 readiness, engagement with industry working groups and ECB/ESMA consultations, vendor and CSD due diligence, and governance over tokenisation pilots.
Firms should also consider DORA and outsourcing obligations, cyber and interoperability risks, and the need for clear legal opinions on digital asset ownership. Opportunities exist for early movers that can offer faster settlement, improved collateral mobility and tokenised product capabilities, but only with robust controls and regulatory engagement. RegCanary will monitor follow-up policy signals and implementation timelines.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
ECB
Original publication, 29 October 2026
Read the original publication ecb.europa.euThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the ECB's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.