FCA Consultation 1 min read

CP26/38: Financial Crime Guide updates

RegCanary analysis of a FCA publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

Although this is a consultation rather than final rules, compliance teams should treat the direction of travel as a signal of where FCA supervision is heading. Firms should map existing financial crime systems and controls against each proposed area, assess exposure to AI and cryptoasset risks, validate sanctions and proliferation financing screening, and review data security and ML/TF controls. Cryptoasset firms should begin readiness planning for the proposed regime from October 2027.

A board-level gap assessment, owner allocation and remediation roadmap would be prudent, alongside a formal consultation response where relevant. Early action can reduce enforcement risk, strengthen customer trust and support safe innovation, while delayed preparation may create remediation pressure as expectations crystallise.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • Sanctions
  • Financial Crime

Source

FCA

Original publication, 23 October 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) fca.org.uk

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the FCA's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo