CP26/36: Cryptoasset perimeter guidance
RegCanary analysis of a FCA publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For compliance teams, the immediate task is to test whether any current or planned activity could move outside, or remain within, the perimeter once the legislative changes are reflected in guidance. Firms should not treat the consultation as settled law; instead, they should map products, tokens, intermediation and payment flows against the proposed exclusions, identify permission and authorisation dependencies, and document the rationale for any perimeter judgement. Legal, compliance, product and financial promotions teams should coordinate, because misclassifying an activity can create unauthorised trading, disclosure and AML/sanctions risks.
A consultation response is also an opportunity to flag practical ambiguities and transitional concerns. The 18 November 2026 deadline is short, so affected firms should prioritise impact assessment now. Final guidance may reduce regulatory burden for some models and create product-design opportunities, but only if firms can evidence a defensible perimeter analysis.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
FCA
Original publication, 19 October 2026
Read the original publication fca.org.ukThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the FCA's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.