← Back to Bank News

Santander UK Performance

Three years of annual-report analysis for Santander UK, whose fiscal year ends 31 December.

Investor relations ↗ Source document ↗ Fiscal year end: 31 December Generated 3 Aug 2026

Key metrics — FY2024

View source document ↗
Metric Value Source quote
Forborne assets net of deferred income £5.4m
Quote
At 31 December 2024 the amount of forborne assets net of deferred income was £5.4m (2023: £nil).
Financial assets with ECL allowance changed to 12-month measurement £6m
Quote
The gross carrying amount of financial assets for which the ECL allowance changed to a 12-month measurement at 31 December 2024 was £6m (2023: £30m).
UK Gilts purchased (notional value) £3.0bn
Quote
The notional value at 31 December 2024 was £3.0bn (2023: £nil).
NII sensitivity to +100bps £167m
Quote
Net Interest Income (NII) sensitivity to +100bps was £167m and to ‑100bps was £(201)m (2023: £220m and £(220)m).
EVE sensitivity to +100bps £(496)m
Quote
Economic Value of Equity (EVE) sensitivity to +100bps was £(496)m and to ‑100bps was £425m (2023: £(299)m and £265m).
Total RWAs £65.5bn
Quote
Total RWAs at 31 December 2024 were £65.5bn (2023: £67.8bn) which are consistent with our regulatory filings.
Transitional IFRS 9 benefit £12.2m
Quote
Capital resources include a transitional IFRS 9 benefit at 31 December 2024 of £12.2m (2023: £43.0m).
Funding Deficit at Risk £830m
Quote
At 31 December 2024, the Funding Deficit at Risk decreased to £830m (2023: £980m), mainly due to the hedging noted above with the interest rate hedge ratio at 98% (2023: 89%) and the inflation hedge ratio at 99% (2023: 82%) on a funding basis.
Interest rate hedge ratio 98%
Quote
At 31 December 2024, the Funding Deficit at Risk decreased to £830m (2023: £980m), mainly due to the hedging noted above with the interest rate hedge ratio at 98% (2023: 89%) and the inflation hedge ratio at 99% (2023: 82%) on a funding basis.
Inflation hedge ratio 99%
Quote
At 31 December 2024, the Funding Deficit at Risk decreased to £830m (2023: £980m), mainly due to the hedging noted above with the interest rate hedge ratio at 98% (2023: 89%) and the inflation hedge ratio at 99% (2023: 82%) on a funding basis.
Aggregate surplus £439m
Quote
The Scheme sections in surplus had an aggregate surplus of £439m at 31 December 2024 (2023: £723m) while there were no sections which had a deficit at 31 December 2024 (2023: one).
Overall funded position £439m surplus
Quote
The overall funded position was a £439m surplus (2023: £682m surplus).
Unfunded liabilities £23m
Quote
There were also unfunded liabilities of £23m at 31 December 2024 (2023: £25m).
Funded defined benefit pension scheme accounting surplus £439m
Quote
Funded defined benefit pension scheme accounting surplus was £439m (2023: £723m)
Internal VaR for traded market risk less than £1m
Quote
The Internal VaR for exposure to traded market risk at 31 December 2024 was less than £1m (2023: less than £1m).
Provision for motor finance commissions £295m
Quote
The Court of Appeal judgment in October 2024 in relation to motor finance commission cases involving other lenders represented a deterioration in our legal risk position and led to a £295m provision.

What changed vs FY2023

New this year

  • Credit risk exposure and mitigation
  • Operational resilience and business disruption
  • Commercial real estate price growth outlook
  • Reputational risk management
  • Pension risk
  • Responsible lending and climate change
  • Regulatory compliance

Continuing

  • Liquidity risk management Expanded to explicitly include contingent liquidity risks and intra-day cash flows.
  • Stress testing and scenario analysis Added emphasis on reverse stress testing within the multi-layered framework.
  • Risk appetite framework Narrowed from a general risk appetite framework to focus specifically on the Liquidity Risk Appetite framework.
  • Interest rate risk Now also considers the balance sheet repricing gap and regular model reviews, while prior explicitly mentioned economic value of equity.
  • Funding strategy and wholesale funding

Dropped since last year

  • Credit risk monitoring and grading
  • Fraud and financial crime management
  • IFRS 9 ECL pro-cyclicality mitigation
  • Retail risk playbook tolerance framework
  • Structural hedge management to support income
  • Watchlist for early problem debt identification
  • Arrears management strategies

Themes

1 Liquidity risk management

The bank manages liquidity risk through its Liquidity Risk Appetite framework, which covers market, funding, structural and contingent liquidity risks and other specific risks such as funding concentrations and intra-day cash flows.

Evidence (6)
  • We manage liquidity risk on a consolidated basis in our CFO division, which is our centralised function for managing funding, liquidity and capital.
  • In line with our liquidity management principles, we avoid an over-reliance on funding from a single product, customer or counterparty.
  • We also maintain enough unencumbered customer assets to support current and future funding and collateral requirements and maintain enough capacity to monetise liquid assets and other counterbalancing capacity on a timely basis.
  • Through our Liquidity Risk Appetite (LRA) framework, we manage our market liquidity risks, funding or structural liquidity risk, contingent liquidity risk, wherever they arise.
  • This can be in retail and corporate deposit outflows, outflows in wholesale secured and unsecured funding and off-balance sheet activities.
  • Other risks our framework covers include funding concentrations, intra-day cash flows, intra-group commitments and support, franchise retention and cross currency risk.

2 Stress testing and scenario analysis

The bank applies a multi-layered approach to stress testing, including reverse stress tests, and uses the outputs to design business plans that mitigate potential impacts of stress scenarios.

Evidence (6)
  • Our stress testing models are subject to a formal review, independent validation and approval process.
  • We take a multi-layered approach to stress testing to capture risks at various levels.
  • We use stress test outputs to design business plans that aim to mitigate potential impacts of possible stress scenarios.
  • We also conduct reverse stress tests.
  • We describe each scenario using a narrative setting out how events might unfold, as well as a market and/or economic context.
  • For example, the key economic factors we reflect in our ICAAP scenarios include house prices, interest rates, unemployment levels, inflation, and the size of the UK economy.

3 Credit risk exposure and mitigation

The bank shows the main differences between its maximum and net exposure to credit risk, including the effects of collateral, netting and risk transfer. It defines the maximum exposure for balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet commitments.

Evidence (6)
  • The types of credit risk mitigation, including collateral, across each of our portfolios are as follows.
  • In addition, from time to time, at a portfolio level we execute significant risk transfer transactions, which typically reduce RWAs.
  • The tables below show the main differences between our maximum and net exposure to credit risk.
  • They show the effects of collateral, netting, and risk transfer to mitigate our exposure.
  • For balance sheet assets, the maximum exposure to credit risk is the carrying value after impairment loss allowances.
  • For off-balance sheet guarantees, the maximum exposure is the maximum amount that we would have to pay if the guarantees were called on.

4 Operational resilience and business disruption

The bank is maturing its frameworks and capabilities to meet the Operational Resilience regulatory deadline by March 2025, assessing important business services against severe but plausible disruption scenarios and investing in strategic programmes to strengthen resilience, especially across its IT estate.

Evidence (6)
  • Operational resilience is the ability to prevent disruption occurring to the extent practicable; adapt systems and processes to continue to provide services and functions in the event of an incident; return to normal running promptly when a disruption is over; and learn and evolve from both incidents and near misses.
  • Operational Resilience is the outcome of executing sound Operational Risk practices.
  • We continued to mature our frameworks and capabilities to support meeting the Operational Resilience requirements by the March 2025 regulatory deadline, with regular updates provided to our Executive and Board Risk committees throughout the year.
  • We assessed the resilience of our important business services using a broad range of severe but plausible disruption scenarios.
  • We ran successful cyberattack and loss of third party scenarios, to ensure that our contingency and recovery strategies were effective in minimising harm to our customers, risk to the safety and soundness of Santander UK, and risk to the orderly functioning or stability to the UK market.
  • We continued to invest in strategic programmes that will further strengthen our resilience position, in particular across our IT estate.

5 Interest rate risk

The bank assesses the impact of interest rate movements on net interest income and economic value, including sensitivity to parallel yield curve shifts and the balance sheet repricing gap, and regularly reviews its risk models and assumptions.

Evidence (6)
  • The table below shows how our net interest income would be affected by a 100bps parallel shift (both up and down) applied instantaneously to the yield curve at 31 December 2024 and 31 December 2023.
  • Sensitivity to parallel shifts represents the amount of risk in a way that we think is both simple and scalable.
  • NII Sensitivity is adversely exposed to down-shock scenarios driven by margin compression of core liabilities, partly offset by the structural position.
  • EVE sensitivity is adversely exposed to rising interest rate scenarios.
  • EVE sensitivity reflects the potential impact on economic value due to the structural mismatch of assets and liabilities (excluding equity) over the longer term.
  • In 2024 NII sensitivity decreased, and EVE sensitivity increased, mainly reflecting the overall increase in the structural hedge position relative to non-rate sensitive liabilities.

6 Commercial real estate price growth outlook

The bank discusses the stabilisation and expected rise in commercial real estate prices, supported by Bank Rate cuts and a return to offices, with growth stabilising around 2% year-on-year.

Evidence (6)
  • outlook for 2025 is likely to see a slow-down in house price growth due to higher swap rates which has pushed up mortgage rates in Q424.
  • As always, the key to house price growth is the supply of housing which continues to be weak.
  • We forecast a c.3% year-on-year growth in house prices by the end of 2025 and remaining at this growth rate for the rest of the forecast period.
  • After falling for seven quarters in a row, CRE prices stabilised in Q224 and rose by 0.3% quarter-on-quarter in Q324 in a sign of the sector turning around after two years of falling prices.
  • We expect prices to continue to rise throughout the forecast period as Bank Rate is reduced before growth stabilises around the 2% year-on-year mark.
  • This is reflected in an average annual growth expectation of 1.6%, in line with the OBR’s latest estimate of the UK’s long run average growth rate.

7 Risk appetite framework

The bank's Liquidity Risk Appetite (LRA) is based on liquidity management principles and is proposed to the Risk division and Board, then reviewed and approved annually by the Board.

Evidence (6)
  • Our LRA is based on the principles of liquidity management we use to manage our balance sheet.
  • Our LRA is proposed to the Risk division and the Board, which is then approved under advice from the Board Risk Committee.
  • Our LRA, in the context of our overall Risk Appetite, is reviewed and approved by the Board each year, or more often if needed.
  • The Risk Appetite statements consist of qualitative statements of appetite supported by risk limits and triggers which operate as a defence against excessive risk taking.
  • We set a clear tolerance in line with business activities, and we also set lower level triggers, parameters and quantitative thresholds across our business areas.
  • We monitor our risk profile and performance against the risk appetite, and we have processes to identify, assess, manage, and report risks and events.

8 Reputational risk management

The bank manages reputational risk with a low Board-agreed appetite, daily monitoring and structured governance, including policies covering environmental and social issues.

Evidence (6)
  • Reputational risk is the risk of damage to the way our reputation and brand are perceived by the public, clients, government, colleagues, investors, or any other interested party.
  • We seek to manage our reputation proactively, underpinned by our aim to be a responsible bank, and through our reputational risk framework.
  • We have a low appetite for reputational risk, which is agreed by the Board at least each year.
  • We assess our exposure to reputational risk daily.
  • Our Reputational and ESCC risk policies define how we create long-term value while managing those risks.
  • For example, financing is prohibited for project-related financing for new CFPP projects worldwide and we will only work with new clients with CFPPs to provide specific financing for renewable energy projects.

9 Funding strategy and wholesale funding

The bank's funding is primarily sourced from customer deposits and a strong wholesale funding base, with access to markets through various instruments including capital, debt and securitisations.

Evidence (6)
  • Customer deposits finance most of our customer lending.
  • We have a strong wholesale funding investor base, diversified across product types and geographies.
  • We access the wholesale funding markets through the issuance of capital, senior unsecured debt, covered bonds, structured notes and short-term funding.
  • We also access these markets through securitisations of certain assets of Santander UK plc and our operating subsidiaries.
  • Our funding strategy continues to be based on maintaining a conservatively structured balance sheet and diverse sources of funding to meet the needs of our business strategy and plans.
  • The CFO Division maintains a funding plan that complies with our LRA and regulatory liquidity and capital requirements.

10 Pension risk

The bank manages pension risk arising from its defined benefit scheme, monitoring key metrics and addressing risks from interest rates, inflation, longevity, and investments.

Evidence (6)
  • Pension risk is one of our key financial risks.
  • Santander UK plc is the sponsor of the Santander (UK) Group Pension Scheme (the Scheme), a defined benefit scheme.
  • Our risk is that, over the long-term, the Scheme’s assets are not enough to meet its liabilities as they fall due.
  • If this happens, we could have to (or choose to) make extra contributions.
  • We might also need to hold more capital to reflect this risk.
  • The Scheme, risk metrics and regulatory capital can be sensitive to changes in the assumptions of the risk categories shown below.

11 Responsible lending and climate change

The bank integrates social, ethical and environmental impacts into risk analysis and aims to support the transition to a low carbon economy, including phasing out thermal coal exposure.

Evidence (5)
  • As part of the Banco Santander group, we comply with the Equator Principles to factor social, ethical and environmental impacts into our risk analysis and decision making for qualifying financial transactions.
  • We aim to support clients and economies in their transition to a low carbon economy, providing financial products and/ or services to business activities that are environmentally and socially responsible.
  • Our Environmental, Social and Climate Change (ESCC) policy sets out how we identify, assess, monitor and manage environmental and social risks and other climate change related activities in the Oil and Gas, Power Generation and Mining and Metals sectors and those arising from businesses engaged in soft commodities.
  • Our ESCC policy prohibits project-related financing for new coal-fired power plants (CFPP) worldwide and we will only work with new clients with CFPPs to provide specific financing for renewable energy projects.
  • In line with Banco Santander's aim, by 2030 we will aim to eliminate all exposure to thermal coal mining and stop providing financial services to power generation clients with more than 10% of revenue from thermal coal.

12 Regulatory compliance

The bank faces a demanding regulatory agenda and continues to deliver regulatory mandates, including Confirmation of Payee and Authorised Push Payment rules, while keeping customer outcomes at the heart.

Evidence (5)
  • Under the PRA’s liquidity rules, Santander UK plc and its subsidiary Cater Allen Limited form the RFB Domestic Liquidity Sub-group (the RFB DoLSub), which allows them to collectively meet regulatory requirements to manage liquidity risk.
  • Each member of the RFB DoLSub will support the other by transferring surplus liquidity in times of stress.
  • We continue to face a demanding regulatory agenda and have multiple ongoing projects to ensure regulatory compliance.
  • We will continue to work through these requirements in 2025, while keeping good customer outcomes at the heart of everything we do.
  • Regulatory mandates we delivered include the Payment Systems Regulator's requirement on Confirmation of Payee for all Payment Service Providers and an Authorised Push Payment mandatory reimbursement regulation, both of which became effective from 7 October 2024.

Narrative

Santander UK FY2024 Annual Report highlights strengthened risk management and new strategic themes

The FY2024 annual report introduces several new themes, including operational resilience and business disruption, credit risk exposure and mitigation, commercial real estate price growth outlook, reputational risk management, pension risk, responsible lending and climate change, and regulatory compliance. Compared with FY2023, the bank dropped themes such as credit risk monitoring and grading, fraud and financial crime management, and structural hedge management to support income.

Continuing themes have been refined: liquidity risk management now explicitly covers contingent liquidity risks and intra-day cash flows, and stress testing now emphasizes reverse stress tests. Key metrics include total RWAs of £65.5bn, NII sensitivity to +100bps of £167m, and a funded defined benefit pension scheme accounting surplus of £439m.

  • Operational resilience frameworks are maturing ahead of the March 2025 regulatory deadline.
  • Commercial real estate prices are expected to stabilise and rise around 2% year-on-year.
  • Interest rate risk metrics show NII sensitivity of £167m and EVE sensitivity of -£496m to a +100bps shift.
  • The bank holds a provision for motor finance commissions of £295m.
  • The liquidity risk appetite framework is reviewed and approved annually by the Board.