FCA Policy 1 min read

PS26/22: ESG ratings: final regime

RegCanary analysis of a FCA publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

For compliance teams, this is not just a disclosure update: it creates a new regulated activity and requires early perimeter assessment against the final PERG guidance. Providers should test whether their ratings, data products or related services fall in scope, then complete a gap analysis against FCA baseline and tailored requirements covering transparency, methodology, governance, conflicts, records and comparability. Firms using ESG ratings—banks, insurers, pension funds, asset managers and wealth managers—should review third-party reliance, procurement and investment decision frameworks to manage data quality and greenwashing risk.

The regime aligns with IOSCO recommendations and supports confidence in sustainable finance, but it raises barriers to entry and compliance costs. Action now: assign ownership, assess authorisation needs, engage with the FCA, update policies and contracts, and prepare evidence for supervisory review. Early movers may gain advantage as trusted, comparable providers; unprepared firms face permission delays and reputational risk.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

FCA

Original publication, 3 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) fca.org.uk

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the FCA's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo