Proposed directive relating to the version of BA returns that form the basis for reporting by auditors
RegCanary analysis of a SARB publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For banks and their external auditors, the practical issue is version control: reporting teams and audit teams must be aligned on the exact return set, data definitions and submission lineage used to support audit conclusions. This is not a major policy overhaul, but it is a meaningful supervisory clarification because inconsistent return versions can create audit evidence gaps, reporting discrepancies and avoidable regulatory scrutiny. Compliance, finance and internal audit teams should review the draft, confirm which BA return versions are currently relied on, and tighten change-control and evidence trails before the directive is finalised.
Banks should also coordinate early with external auditors so that reporting packs, reconciliations and sign-offs reference the same return version. The consultation may present an opportunity to reduce ambiguity, standardise audit evidence and strengthen prudential reporting governance. Firms should monitor for the final directive and any accompanying implementation expectations.
No comment deadline or effective date is stated in the provided content.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
SARB
Original publication, 21 October 2026
Read the original publication resbank.co.zaThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the SARB's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.