Peer Review of Türkiye
RegCanary analysis of a FSB publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For compliance teams, the practical message is to treat the review as a benchmark: firms with Turkish operations, counterparties, or crypto/stablecoin exposure should check whether their governance, custody, reserve, AML/CFT and cross-border controls align with FSB expectations. Firms without direct Türkiye exposure should still monitor the findings because peer reviews often shape supervisory dialogue and market expectations in other jurisdictions. Action: map current crypto and stablecoin controls to the FSB recommendations, document any Türkiye-linked risk, and track follow-up findings.
No immediate deadline is stated.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
FSB
Original publication, 11 November 2026
Read the original publication fsb.orgThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the FSB's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.