MiCAR’s Transitional Period Ends: AMLA’s Guidance on AML/CFT Risk
RegCanary analysis of a MFSA publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For compliance teams, the focus shifts from transition planning to evidencing a risk-based AML/CFT framework proportionate to crypto-asset products, customers and distribution channels. Firms should reassess customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, travel-rule data handling and suspicious activity reporting, and ensure governance and MLRO oversight are documented. Banking, payments and investment firms with crypto exposure should also revisit counterparty and onboarding controls.
Action items: confirm MiCAR authorisation or reliance position; map AMLA guidance to existing policies; update enterprise-wide risk assessments; test monitoring and screening scenarios; close data gaps; train staff; and prepare board-level MI. The guidance does not create a new deadline, but it reinforces that supervisors will expect immediate alignment now that the transitional window has closed. Risks include remediation costs, de-risking, supervisory challenge and loss of market access for unauthorised providers.
Opportunities include greater market trust, passporting within a harmonised regime and competitive advantage for firms with mature controls.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- Financial Crime
Source
MFSA
Original publication, 21 October 2026
Read the original publication mfsa.mtThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the MFSA's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.