AMF Policy 1 min read

MiCA review: The AMF, ACPR, Banque de France and French Treasury publish their joint proposals

RegCanary analysis of a AMF publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

The publication is not binding and no immediate compliance deadline is indicated, so direct near-term obligations are limited. However, compliance teams should treat it as a horizon-scanning priority, particularly firms with EU crypto authorisations, stablecoin activity, custody services or cross-border ambitions. Actions include assessing exposure to French and EU crypto markets, reviewing governance and controls against likely review themes such as authorisation, market abuse, consumer protection, operational resilience and cross-border supervision, and engaging through trade bodies or supervisory channels.

Firms should also monitor for divergence between the UK and EU regimes. The proposals may create opportunities for well-governed firms to shape the review and position themselves for clearer EU requirements, while weaker compliance models face greater medium-term risk.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

AMF

Original publication, 21 October 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) amf-france.org

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the AMF's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo