Keuzebegeleiding door pensioenuitvoerders kan beter
RegCanary analysis of a AFM publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
While providers appear motivated to improve guidance, the findings point to gaps in journey design, disclosure and decision support. For compliance teams, this is a reminder that choice guidance is a conduct issue, not just a communications task. Firms should map participant decision points, test whether all options are visible and understandable, and evidence how trade-offs and long-term effects are explained.
Supervisory follow-up is likely, so providers should retain records of guidance materials, complaints and outcomes. Actionable steps include reviewing retirement and decumulation choice journeys, simplifying language, checking consistency across channels, and embedding fair treatment and vulnerability considerations. There is no explicit deadline, but early gap assessment is prudent.
The opportunity is to strengthen engagement and trust by helping participants make informed choices.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- General Regulation
Source
AFM
Original publication, 26 October 2026
Read the original publication afm.nlThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the AFM's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.