AFM 1 min read

Keuzebegeleiding door pensioenuitvoerders kan beter

RegCanary analysis of a AFM publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

While providers appear motivated to improve guidance, the findings point to gaps in journey design, disclosure and decision support. For compliance teams, this is a reminder that choice guidance is a conduct issue, not just a communications task. Firms should map participant decision points, test whether all options are visible and understandable, and evidence how trade-offs and long-term effects are explained.

Supervisory follow-up is likely, so providers should retain records of guidance materials, complaints and outcomes. Actionable steps include reviewing retirement and decumulation choice journeys, simplifying language, checking consistency across channels, and embedding fair treatment and vulnerability considerations. There is no explicit deadline, but early gap assessment is prudent.

The opportunity is to strengthen engagement and trust by helping participants make informed choices.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

AFM

Original publication, 26 October 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) afm.nl

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the AFM's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo