FCA Guidance 1 min read

Fair value in consumer finance

RegCanary analysis of a FCA publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

This publication highlights both exemplary practices and common shortcomings in how firms assess, evidence, and monitor fair value. For compliance teams, this serves as a timely reminder to review existing fair value frameworks, ensuring they are robust, evidence-based, and aligned with PRIN 2A.4 and FG22/5. Firms should proactively identify gaps, enhance monitoring, and document rationale for pricing decisions.

The FCA's risk-led approach signals continued scrutiny, with potential for supervisory intervention where outcomes are poor. Executives should consider this a strategic priority, as demonstrating fair value not only mitigates regulatory risk but also builds customer trust and competitive advantage. Key actions include conducting thorough fair value assessments, improving data collection, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

This is not new rulemaking but a clear indication of supervisory expectations; firms ignoring it do so at their peril.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

FCA

Original publication, 29 October 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) fca.org.uk

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the FCA's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo