HM Treasury News 1 min read

Child Trust Fund injustice to end under Government plans

RegCanary analysis of a HM Treasury publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

For firms that administer or invest CTF assets, the practical focus will be on how attorney, deputy or equivalent authority is evidenced, how capacity is assessed and recorded, and how vulnerable-customer safeguards are maintained without creating unnecessary friction. Compliance teams should treat this as a forthcoming change rather than an immediate rule: monitor HMT and legislative detail, map affected customer journeys, review account terms and authority-verification processes, and brief front-line teams on escalation routes. Firms should also consider data-sharing consents, complaint handling, record retention and consistency with vulnerable-customer and consumer-duty expectations.

The opportunity is to improve outcomes for a historically underserved group and reduce complaint and remediation risk, while preserving fraud and financial-crime controls. Action now: assign ownership, assess operational readiness, prepare training and communications, and engage legal/professional-deputy stakeholders before final requirements are confirmed.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

HM Treasury

Original publication, 3 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) gov.uk

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the HM Treasury's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo