Check genuine HMRC contact that uses more than one communication method
RegCanary analysis of a HMRC publication
Why it matters
RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.
For financial services firms, this signals heightened regulatory focus on client protection against sophisticated impersonation scams. Compliance teams must immediately review and enhance their client communication verification protocols, particularly for tax-related interactions. The guidance underscores the need for robust internal procedures to distinguish legitimate HMRC correspondence from fraudulent attempts, which directly impacts client asset protection and regulatory reporting accuracy.
Firms should integrate this multi-channel verification principle into their financial crime frameworks and staff training programs. Failure to implement adequate controls could expose firms to client losses, reputational damage, and potential regulatory scrutiny regarding client protection standards.
Who this affects
Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.
- Payment Services
Source
HMRC
Original publication, 6 October 2026
Read the original publication gov.ukThis is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the HMRC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.