HMRC Guidance 1 min read

Check genuine HMRC contact that uses more than one communication method

RegCanary analysis of a HMRC publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

For financial services firms, this signals heightened regulatory focus on client protection against sophisticated impersonation scams. Compliance teams must immediately review and enhance their client communication verification protocols, particularly for tax-related interactions. The guidance underscores the need for robust internal procedures to distinguish legitimate HMRC correspondence from fraudulent attempts, which directly impacts client asset protection and regulatory reporting accuracy.

Firms should integrate this multi-channel verification principle into their financial crime frameworks and staff training programs. Failure to implement adequate controls could expose firms to client losses, reputational damage, and potential regulatory scrutiny regarding client protection standards.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • Payment Services

Source

HMRC

Original publication, 6 October 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) gov.uk

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the HMRC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo