CSSF Guidance 1 min read

Annex to Circular CSSF 22/822

RegCanary analysis of a CSSF publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

For Luxembourg-supervised financial institutions, this is a prompt to reconcile internal country-risk lists with the regulator's expectations. Compliance teams should confirm whether any new or removed jurisdictions affect existing customers, counterparties, or transactions; update onboarding, periodic review, screening, and transaction-monitoring parameters; and ensure EDD files evidence the rationale for any counter-measures. The update also calls for MLRO sign-off on risk-assessment changes and targeted training for front-office and monitoring staff.

Firms should be mindful that outdated jurisdictional controls can create financial-crime, reputational, and supervisory risks, while a timely, documented refresh can demonstrate a robust risk-based approach. No new deadline is stated, but RegCanary recommends immediate gap analysis and prompt implementation.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

CSSF

Original publication, 4 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) cssf.lu

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the CSSF's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo