OCC News 1 min read

Agencies Extend Comment Period for Proposed Third-Party Risk Management Guidance

RegCanary analysis of a OCC publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

The change is procedural, so no new requirements take effect now, but it signals continued supervisory focus on how banks and credit unions oversee vendors, fintech partners, subcontractors and other service providers. Compliance, procurement, legal and technology teams should use the additional time to compare current vendor lifecycle practices with the proposal's likely expectations: complete third-party inventories, risk-based due diligence, contract clauses covering audit and access, ongoing monitoring, concentration-risk assessment, and exit planning. Firms with critical operational dependencies should prioritize gap assessments and board/management reporting.

Comments are due December 16; stakeholders who want to influence the final text should coordinate submissions. RegCanary view: treat the extension as preparation time, not a deferral—final guidance could require formal program updates and contract remediation.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

OCC

Original publication, 13 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) occ.gov

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the OCC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo