ASIC Enforcement 1 min read

26-279MR ASIC sues Commonwealth Bank alleging tens of thousands of business customers overcharged fees

RegCanary analysis of a ASIC publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

The allegations involve millions of dollars in undisclosed fees, raising serious concerns about customer communication and fair treatment. For compliance teams, this enforcement action serves as a critical reminder to review fee disclosure practices, ensure all charges are clearly communicated, and consider remediation if discrepancies are found. UK firms, while not directly subject to ASIC, should take note of the international regulatory scrutiny on business banking fees and proactively assess their own practices against FCA principles of fair treatment and transparency.

Key actions include auditing business account fee structures, enhancing customer communication, and strengthening oversight of product terms. The case also highlights the reputational and financial risks of inadequate disclosure, with potential for significant penalties and customer redress. Firms should prepare for increased regulatory attention in this area and consider using this as an opportunity to build trust through transparent pricing.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

ASIC

Original publication, 12 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) asic.gov.au

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the ASIC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo