ASIC Enforcement 1 min read

26-267MR Federal Court upholds $11 million in penalties and disqualification against iSignthis and former director and CEO Nickolas John Karantzis

RegCanary analysis of a ASIC publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

For compliance teams, the message is that director accountability and public-company disclosure obligations remain high-priority supervisory themes, particularly in payments and fintech. Firms should not treat contested proceedings as a reason to defer governance remediation. Practical steps include reviewing board and executive oversight of regulatory disclosures, testing approval and escalation controls for market-sensitive statements, and ensuring directors understand personal exposure.

Listed payments/fintech firms should also consider targeted director training and independent reviews of disclosure frameworks. While the release does not create a new deadline, it is a useful board-level reminder that penalties and disqualification are credible outcomes when conduct and disclosure standards fall short.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

ASIC

Original publication, 3 November 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) asic.gov.au

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the ASIC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo