ASIC News 1 min read

26-240MR ASIC review finds room for improvement in mortgage brokers’ best interests duty practices

RegCanary analysis of a ASIC publication

Representative image

Why it matters

RegCanary's analysis of what this means for regulated firms.

While the release is not new law, it puts the broking sector on notice: supervisory expectations are rising, and poor documentation or inconsistent advice processes will attract scrutiny. For compliance teams, this means revisiting how best interests duty is embedded—from fact-finds and product comparisons to conflict management and file notes. Firms should test whether recommendation rationales are clear, specific and defensible, and whether training and monitoring catch poor practice early.

Lenders and aggregators should also consider how they oversee broker networks, given shared reputational and regulatory risk. The review creates a near-term priority to strengthen evidence trails and customer outcome testing. It also presents an opportunity: brokers that can clearly demonstrate BID compliance may win trust and market share as ASIC continues to focus on consumer credit conduct.

RegCanary view: treat this as a prompt for self-assessment, not a one-off read. Allocate ownership, update procedures, and document remediation.

Who this affects

Sectors and firm types identified in the analysis.

  • General Regulation

Source

ASIC

Original publication, 13 October 2026

Read the original publication (opens in a new tab) asic.gov.au

This is RegCanary's analysis, not the regulator's text. It summarises and interprets the publication above; it is not the ASIC's original wording, and it is not legal advice. Always rely on the original source.

Share

Weekly Briefing

Get the weekly briefing.

The regulatory changes that matter, with RegCanary analysis of what they mean for your firm. Delivered every Friday. Unsubscribe anytime.

Need this tailored to your firm's permissions? Book a demo